Six states are busily approving initiatives and amendments to their constitution banning gay marriage today. This makes me sad.
I used to be opposed to gay marriage until I sat down and examined my own feelings about it and realized that my opposition was rooted in emotional and moral judgements fostered by my Catholic upbringing. I supported the idea of extending the same benefits married couples enjoy — insurance, property rights, etc — but I didn’t like the idea of Adam marrying Steve.
Then one day I set my feelings aside and looked at it without judgement and realized that I couldn’t think of a single rational reason why I should care one way or another how two people who love each other express that love. It’s between them and doesn’t affect me at all. In fact, it’s none of my business. So I changed my mind. And now that I’m an ordained minister, I wouldn’t think twice about presiding over their wedding if they asked me to. In fact, I’d be honored.
The whole argument and mindset against gay marriage is, I think, based on “icky-poo”. It’s knee-jerk prejudice, being uncomfortable with the thought of men kissing men (and more — eek!), it’s hating them for being different. In my mind, it’s exactly the same prejudice that made blacks second class citizens before the civil rights movement. That was wrong and so is this.
Calling this opposition “defense of marriage” is asinine. Hell, if marriage as an institution needs saving, it’s from the friggin’ straights. Can gays do any more to hurt the institution of marriage than straights are with their current 50% divorce rate or Britney Spears is with her revolving door to the annulment? If anything, I think maybe gays could teach us a thing or two.
And how does Adam and Steve exchanging vows weaken my marriage? Is Beth going to serve me with divorce papers when they say “I do”? How does it threaten the institution? Will marriage be completely gone by the time Zoe is old enough for it? Will we turn into a nation of singles bars? Please, spare me.
It’s prejudice, plain and simple. Why not let them marry? Why not let them share the same legal benefits Adam and Eve do? Your church can keep right on being narrow-minded and refusing to perform the ceremony for them — nobody’s trying to change that, but why not let the Elvis impersonator in Vegas marry them, or a justice of the peace? Or me?
They love each other and want to pledge their lives to one another. How can that be bad?